South Minneapolis News

collapse
Home / Daily News Analysis / Meta launches cheaper smart glasses without Ray-Ban

Meta launches cheaper smart glasses without Ray-Ban

Jun 29, 2026  Twila Rosenbaum  25 views
Meta launches cheaper smart glasses without Ray-Ban

Meta is breaking away from its exclusive partnership with Ray-Ban to launch a cheaper line of smart glasses, starting at $299. The new Meta Glasses—named Fury, Adventurer, and Meta Glasses by Kylie—drop the iconic Ray-Ban branding while retaining the same internal technology found in the more expensive Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 glasses. The move is aimed at attracting a wider audience by offering a lower entry price without sacrificing core features like AI integration, camera capabilities, and prescription support.

A Stepping Stone to Accessibility

For three years, the names Meta and Ray-Ban were practically inseparable in the smart glasses market. The partnership with EssilorLuxottica, the parent company of Ray-Ban, lent the devices a fashion credibility that earlier smart glasses—with their bulky frames and sci-fi aesthetics—had sorely lacked. By adopting Ray-Ban's iconic Wayfarer and similar silhouettes, Meta's smart glasses became the first to look like ordinary eyewear. Yet the starting price of $379 for the Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 limited their appeal.

Alex Himel, Meta's vice president of wearables, explained the rationale: "We just feel like we need to have a pair of glasses at a lower price point, and we were trying to figure out what could work there. EssilorLuxottica do have glasses at other brands with lower price points, but they're not really that well known, so there wasn't an obvious fit." The solution was to create a separate Meta-branded lineup, still manufactured with EssilorLuxottica's help, that could sell for $80 less while maintaining design and build quality.

The new glasses come in three distinct styles. The Fury features a thick, square frame reminiscent of the Ray-Ban Meta Display. The Adventurer is slightly slimmer and available in standard and large sizes. The Meta Glasses by Kylie Jenner embrace a Y2K aesthetic with thinner rims designed to sit lower on the nose, complete with a tiny gem on the upper left lens. Each style comes in multiple colors, and all include a special carrying case—the Kylie version has an integrated mirror.

Under the Hood: Familiar Specs, Subtle Upgrades

Internally, the Meta Glasses are nearly identical to the Ray-Ban Meta Optics Styles released earlier this year. They feature the same camera module, slightly longer battery life, and the same audio and microphone array. The camera, which appears smaller than in the original Ray-Ban Meta, was actually downsized in the Optics Styles back in March. The glasses support prescriptions ranging from -12 to +2.25, with an optician referral needed for stronger lenses.

One of the most practical upgrades is the adjustable fit. The nose pads click into three preset positions, and the temple tips contain a bendable wire for a custom shape. Oversized hinges allow the arms to extend outward for wider faces—a welcome change for those who found previous smart glasses too tight. These adjustments, combined with the lighter weight of the non-Ray-Ban frames, make the glasses more comfortable for all-day wear.

Privacy and the Trust Problem

Despite the hardware improvements, Meta's biggest challenge remains public trust. Recent reports from major news outlets have highlighted ongoing development of a facial recognition feature for the smart glasses, alongside an increase in incidents where wearers misuse the glasses to record people without consent. Himel acknowledged the issue, stating, "We know that there's tampering today... If people aren't comfortable with you wearing the glasses, not only do we personally think that's bad, but we wouldn't have a business anymore."

He promised that Meta is working on privacy improvements that will be announced soon, though he declined to provide details. The company is also engaging with policymakers to push for consistent regulations across different states and countries. "If there are different rules in different states or places you go, that just becomes hard for people. It's hard for us too, because then we can't build one thing," Himel added.

The challenge is reminiscent of the early days of smartphones, which faced public skepticism over always-on cameras and location tracking. However, smartphones offered immediate killer apps—texting, maps, social media—that made the privacy tradeoffs seem worthwhile. Smart glasses are still searching for that one irresistible use case that will convince millions to wear a camera on their face.

AI as the Killer App

Meta is betting that artificial intelligence will be that use case. The new Meta Glasses launch with Muse Spark, the first model from Meta's Superintelligence Labs. (An update will bring Muse Spark to older Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses in the US and Canada.) The AI supports 14 languages, including Mandarin, Arabic, and Hindi, and can provide real-time translations, answer questions about objects in view, and offer recommendations.

In a hands-on demonstration, the AI—voiced by Kylie Jenner for the collaboration model—produced smoother, more conversational responses. When asked to recommend a gift, it inquired about colors and mood, then suggested specific items like a lavender donut charm. It also estimated the caloric content of a plate of canapés (280 calories, with a caveat). While imperfect—there was slight latency in translation demos—the AI represents a meaningful step forward from earlier Meta AI models.

Other features include pedestrian turn-by-turn navigation and a "dynamic photo" mode that captures multiple frames and selects the best one. These capabilities aim to integrate the glasses into everyday life without requiring constant phone interaction.

With the pricing, styling, and AI improvements, Meta's glasses are arguably the best-smart glasses now available. The hardware is solid, the fit is comfortable, and the AI is becoming genuinely useful. But the company's chequered history with privacy continues to cast a long shadow. The next few months will reveal whether Meta can deliver the promised privacy features effectively enough to earn broad consumer trust—or whether the $299 price tag will be enough to overcome lingering doubts.


Source: The Verge News


Share:

Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies Cookie Policy