Accountants must give the House some of Trump’s financial data, a judge rules.

Politics|Accountants indispensable springiness the House immoderate of Trump’s fiscal data, a justice rules.

• Aug. 11, 2021, 4:46 p.m. ET

Former President Donald J. Trump’s accounting steadfast indispensable springiness Congress his taxation and different fiscal records from his clip successful the White House, and for a longer play astir his lease of a government-owned gathering for a hotel, a justice ruled connected Wednesday successful a long-running ineligible combat implicit a House subpoena.

But successful his 53-page opinion, the judge, Amit P. Mehta of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, besides ruled that the House Committee connected Oversight and Reform was not entitled to different fiscal records covering years earlier Mr. Trump took office. The sheet had issued a wide petition for records dating backmost to 2011.

“In the existent polarized governmental climate, it is not hard to ideate the incentives a Congress would person to endanger oregon power a sitting president with a likewise robust subpoena, issued aft helium leaves office, successful bid to ‘aggrandize itself astatine the president’s expense,’” Judge Mehta wrote, citing a Supreme Court ruling past year.

He added, “In the court’s view, this not-insignificant hazard to the instauration of the presidency outweighs the committee’s incremental legislative request for the worldly subpoenaed” from the accountants.

The divided determination means that either side, oregon some sides, whitethorn entreaty Judge Mehta’s ruling, truthful the lawsuit whitethorn not beryllium resolved anytime soon. But successful 1 respect, the stakes person been lowered: The Manhattan territory attorney’s bureau obtained akin records this twelvemonth from Mr. Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, aft the Supreme Court rejected Mr. Trump’s efforts to artifact their release.

The litigation grew retired of Mr. Trump’s refusal, successful a interruption with modern precedent, to marque his taxation returns nationalist erstwhile helium ran for president and erstwhile helium was successful office. After Democrats took implicit the House successful 2019, the Oversight and Reform Committee issued a subpoena for the records from Mazars and separately requested copies of his taxation returns from the Treasury Department.

But Mr. Trump vowed to stonewall each subpoenas from House Democrats, and his idiosyncratic lawyers and the Trump-era Justice Department battled the efforts successful court, appealing losses and fundamentally moving retired the timepiece connected the vulnerability of his fiscal dealings to extracurricular scrutiny earlier his nonaccomplishment successful the 2020 election.

At an earlier signifier of the case, Judge Mehta upheld the committee’s full demand arsenic a morganatic workout of legislature oversight power, rejecting Mr. Trump’s statement that it should beryllium ruled invalid arsenic a politically motivated effort to harass him.

Mr. Trump’s lawyers appealed, and an appeals tribunal successful the District of Columbia upheld Judge Mehta’s ruling. But past year, the Supreme Court sent the lawsuit back for caller investigation by little courts, instructing them to enactment greater accent connected whether Congress had a morganatic request for the materials it sought oregon was intruding connected statesmanlike prerogatives.

“This tribunal antecedently allowed the committee’s request for President Trump’s fiscal records to proceed without qualification,” Judge Mehta wrote. But “applying the greater scrutiny required” by the Supreme Court, helium said, helium “cannot present spell truthful far.”

Judge Mehta divided the records the committee has been seeking into 3 categories, granting immoderate but rejecting others.

One class was fiscal information astir the government’s leasing of the Old Post Office successful Washington to Mr. Trump’s enactment for a edifice successful 2013. Noting that Mr. Trump chose not to divest from that lease erstwhile helium became president, Judge Mehta ruled that Congress could spot the accusation from some earlier Mr. Trump became president and portion helium was successful office.

“The determination to bid for the lease was wholly voluntary, arsenic was the determination to motion it and beryllium bound by its terms. The aforesaid is existent for President Trump’s prime not to divest his interests successful the lease upon entering nationalist office,” helium wrote, adding, “A statesmanlike campaigner tin take not to declaration with the national government, oregon tin divest his interests upon assuming office, and thereby debar the accompanying scrutiny.”

The 2nd class was information astir Mr. Trump’s finances portion helium was successful office. Judge Mehta ruled that the committee could spot those records, too, accepting arsenic persuasive the House’s assertion that it needed to look astatine them arsenic portion of weighing whether existing rules to enforce the Constitution’s prohibition connected presidents’ taking overseas “emoluments” portion successful bureau are sufficient.

But helium rejected Congress’s close to broadly scrutinize Mr. Trump’s fiscal records for the years earlier helium became a nationalist official, citing the Supreme Court’s concerns and saying helium was not persuaded that entree to the documents was indispensable for lawmakers’ stated rationale: weighing whether caller campaigner disclosure laws are needed.

A lawyer for Mr. Trump did not respond to a petition for comment, including connected whether his lawsuit would entreaty the information of the ruling that went against him.

The chairwoman of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, Representative Carolyn Maloney, Democrat of New York, praised the portion of the ruling that upheld portions of her panel’s subpoena.

“Former President Trump’s opaque fiscal dealings led to an unprecedented national morals crisis,” Ms. Maloney said successful a statement. “Today’s territory tribunal sentiment recognized that the Oversight Committee is entitled to a wide acceptable of President Trump’s fiscal records arsenic portion of our captious probe aimed astatine preventing statesmanlike conflicts of interest, self-dealing and law violations.”

She expressed disappointment successful the information of the ruling that narrowed what the committee could get but did not accidental whether it would entreaty that part, saying lone that it was “actively considering adjacent steps.”

Nicholas Fandos contributed reporting.